View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
stan_allen
Joined: 19 Dec 2005 Posts: 1129
|
Posted: Dec Sat 09, 2006 11:39 am Post subject: Thank you for participating in a democratic debate |
|
|
Well, I wouldn't go so far as to say there's documentation of second-hand perfume killing anyone, but again, the "evidence" of second-hand smoke causing death is overblown.
Whether or not something is commonly accepted as undesirable is not the issue - the issue is whether we want laws to regulate behavior that should be determined privately. So again, if the majority of casino patrons wants the casinos to be non-smoking, the casinos will throw out those ashtrays so fast it'll make your head spin - but I support the view that casinos, restaurants, movie theatres, and all the other venues that become part of this debate are intelligent enough to enact rules of their choosing, rather than having the government make these choices.
And Alison, no, you're certainly not the only one who hates the reek (sorry folks, it is indeed spelled "reek") of butts - er, cigarettes - I just want to offer up some support for the libertarian view of the debate. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alison
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 1150
|
Posted: Dec Sat 09, 2006 12:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I understand your point as well Stan.
I will say though that there are lots of facts that support the effects of Second hand smoke.
I guess it does not matter in the long fun. With everythign else we are doing, we wont survive much longer unless we do some serious changes. Global Warming! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
remano
Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Posts: 717
|
Posted: Dec Sat 09, 2006 1:27 pm Post subject: Re: Thank you for participating in a democratic debate |
|
|
stan_allen wrote: | * * * I just want to offer up some support for the libertarian view of the debate. |
The libertarian view is that government should not interfere with your right to swing your fist, until it hits my face. Then government can step in and control your conduct, even by libertarian standards. It's called battery.
By the same token, you should not be able to force me to breathe unwanted chemicals. The libertarian view is that individuals should be able to choose for themselves, but a smoker forces people around him to breathe chemicals they don't choose. The libertarian view is that I should not be forced to breathe your chemicals if I don't want to, and it is as proper for government to restrict that as it is for government to prohibit you from assaulting me. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alison
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 1150
|
Posted: Dec Sat 09, 2006 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thank you remano!!!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Barb
Joined: 17 Dec 2005 Posts: 82 Location: Portland, Or.
|
Posted: Dec Sat 09, 2006 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OK Allison, Im with you--I smoked for many many years but quit old turkey 17 years ago. Now I cant stand smoke filled air and when I am playing slots I always play 2 machines at the same time to have a little room in between me any any possible smokers. I agree that with so much information about the dangers of smoking im surprised so many people still do smoke. Anyhow, this is an interesting discussion. Barb |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alison
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 1150
|
Posted: Dec Sun 10, 2006 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good for for quitting Barb!! I too quit cold turkey about 9 years ago. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BC Dave Site Admin
Joined: 18 Dec 2005 Posts: 1594
|
Posted: Dec Sun 10, 2006 8:37 pm Post subject: Smokin! |
|
|
You non-smokers must have upset my Avatar - he's never smoked before!
And for a message board that sometimes gets a little on the quiet side...It sure is smokin now!
All kidding aside, I stand firmly with what I said before. The facilites in question are private property and what goes on there is between the owner and his or her guests. The government's job is to protect private property which is a fundamental right of the individual. This law (as are many others) is an example of the government violating property rights. These rights are basic American values. They should be values of citizens of all countries but most of humanity hasn't figured that out yet. Are Americans forgetting what they once knew?
It would do my heart good to see that law struck down as unconstitutional.
And thanks, John!
BC Dave |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alison
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 1150
|
Posted: Dec Mon 11, 2006 7:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
BC DAve,
they tried to say the law was unconstitutional here in Wa, but that failed them.
Ali |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stan_allen
Joined: 19 Dec 2005 Posts: 1129
|
Posted: Dec Mon 11, 2006 9:52 am Post subject: What smoke through yonder casion flows |
|
|
Well, at least we're all getting lots of mileage out of our wonderful discussion board!
The lesson here is that this should have been turned into a poll question; that would have better reflected our democracy, and would settle the question through sheer force of numbers.
And if the casinos are interested, they'd look at such polls, and make the decision themselves.
As for the libertarian view, it still primarily applies to the concept of whether government should have the right to reguate decisions that are better left to the owners of private property; it isn't applicable to whether a particular activity which is the prerogative of consenting adults is deemed "good" or "bad". I can no more force you to ingest unwanted chemicals than I can force you to enter a particular casino.
Again, the debate is not about whether smoking is good or bad, it's about the extent to which government should be controlling the activities of private individuals, and while a casino or a department store may feel like public property, it really isn't. Having said that, I re-concede that if a majority of voters pass a particular ballot initiative, it's hard to argue that it shouldn't be honored.
And that, of course, could open up some far worse cans of worms, but I won't go there, 'cuz I think I've done enough damage already.
Fine, I'll open my own casino where I can smoke my lungs out - in my treehouse - and I'll invite all my little friends - oh, wait, that was Bart Simpson - sorry. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BC Dave Site Admin
Joined: 18 Dec 2005 Posts: 1594
|
Posted: Dec Mon 11, 2006 11:15 am Post subject: Smoking ban |
|
|
Being a law abiding citizen, I'll, of course, go along with this law. But here's a point I should have made earlier. The constitution's intent is to protect the rights of all citizens. And that includes limits on laws majorities can vote on and pass, that restrict the rights on minorities. These initiatives fall into that category. Absolute democracy is, of course, not what the U.S.A. is all about. It's about the upholding of individual rights.
BC Dave |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alison
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 1150
|
Posted: Dec Mon 11, 2006 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
blah blah blah....
can we put it to rest yet? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stan_allen
Joined: 19 Dec 2005 Posts: 1129
|
Posted: Dec Mon 11, 2006 11:39 am Post subject: Smokin' Joe |
|
|
I guess we should - after all, we achieved the goal of getting Dave to customize his avatar based on our debate; nothing better can be accomplished from this! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alison
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 1150
|
Posted: Dec Mon 11, 2006 11:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
i agree! i must say i love the avatar. Pretty funny!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BC Dave Site Admin
Joined: 18 Dec 2005 Posts: 1594
|
Posted: Dec Mon 11, 2006 1:03 pm Post subject: Smokin Avatar |
|
|
Thanks Gang! That's all I was really after. BC Dave |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alison
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 1150
|
Posted: Dec Mon 11, 2006 1:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i think someone has too much time on their hands...lol |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|